For my first time watching an
entire episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, I was kind of impressed. I was surprised
that over three hundred pages of Dracula were condensed into a forty-five
minute episode. I was also shocked how
the gender roles were portrayed throughout the show. I couldn’t believe how
weak the female characters were made out to be, and as the show went on, the
men looked just as bad as the women did.
The producers did an excellent job of mocking how ridiculous gender
roles are while showing that these problems still exist. While most of the
women were made out to be weak, male- dependent characters, most of the males were
made out to be jealous, cocky, and could be easily described as what we call
pigs.
There
were similarities in both the TV show and the novel. Both works had this
Dracula character that was able to seduce male and female characters. He sensed
when there was a feeling of sexual frustration/oppression, and he went after
whoever was feeling it. Dracula had the power to control people’s minds and
their dreams. He also had the power of shape shifting into different forms to
disguise himself. In both works we see him as the vampire, a wolf, a bat and a
mist. In order to travel, he needs dirt from his homeland. He is only present
at night. And lastly, we don’t get to see his perspective.
The
differences are quite obvious. In the novel, no one knows what a vampire is
until Van Helsing introduces the idea, people witness it themselves, or until
they are in the process of transforming into one. In Buffy the Vampire Slayer,
everyone knows what a vampire is. Buffy doesn’t even believe that Dracula is
the real Dracula when she first meets him, because she has dealt with many vampires
claiming that title.
The
women are not seen as how women wanted to be represented. Take Willow’s
character. For my first time meeting her, I’m not impressed. She is the
definition of what most men feel women should be. She is seen as weak,
dependent on men, and she can’t think or do anything for herself. For example,
when Giles tells her that he’s thinking about going back to London, she
responds with “We still need to be watched.” Even during the scene where Dracula
turns himself into a bat, she states that she wishes Giles was there “because
he would know what to do.” God forbid if she thought for anything by herself.
Next is
Anya. Anya is what society calls a “slut.” Why? Because she is not afraid of
admitting who she slept with, and even if she was afraid to, everyone already
knows. The character of Spike (who doesn’t
even seem close to this friend group) was surprised as hell when Dracula came
back for her, but he learns quickly that Dracula is really there for Buffy. If that’s
not enough proof for her “slutty” character, her attire is enough to convince
you otherwise. Her deep V-neck spaghetti strap top doesn’t leave a lot of room
for the imagination.
Then we
have Buffy. Her attire is modest for the most part, but what’s really to focus
on is how flawless her skin and makeup are the entire time the film is on her.
Even in her sleep her makeup is on point. Let’s be real, no one looks that good
with makeup on in the middle of the night. The show features her as your
typical blonde, almost valley girl. At one part she calls herself a “repeat-o
girl” because she can’t stop repeating the same thing. And they also show her
being kind of weak when Dracula turns himself into a bat. Instead of worrying
about how she can destroy him, she worries about the bat flying around her
head. Besides her perfectness, she is an ideal female character. She thinks for
herself, fights for herself, and is very independent. Though she technically
does have Giles there “watching” her, she’s been kicking butt on her own.
Unlike the other two females, Buffy is able to step away from the norm. She doesn’t
fall entirely into Dracula’s thrall and ends up defeating him. What a woman.
As for
the men, we don’t get very good vibes from them either. First is Xander. His
character can be summed up as a tool. He is cocky, is always looking for a
fight and is jealous when claiming what is his. The best part of the entire
show is when Dracula seduces him, making Xander obsessed with him. Xander loses
his manliness as he is in his own thrall with Dracula. And even when Buffy
defeats Dracula, Xander tries to reclaim his manliness by saying that he will
no longer be the “spider eating man bitch who eats insects and gets funny syphilis…he
is done being a butt monkey.” What a manly man.
Giles
starts off as being a senex/father figure to the group, which is great.
However, as soon as he enters Dracula’s castle, he is seduced by three sisters
in red. All of his morals fly out the window when these girls are ripping his
shirt apart, tickling his bare skin and licking his body. Who could resist all
three? Obviously one woman wasn’t good enough, but add two more to the mix and
we’re in heaven. Riley comes to rescue him and he doesn’t even want to leave.
Instead he states, “There was no possible way of escape…Oh, I forgot my shoe.”
Anybody else getting the sense of male voyeurism?
Riley is the best man here. He is
logical and perfect for Buffy. He is confident in himself so much, that when
Buffy was seduced by Dracula, he couldn’t get mad. His only flaw was telling
Buffy that she “throws like girl.” Which he was right, that next throw she made
was so good, Riley couldn’t catch it and ended up hurt.
Then we have Dracula. He has the
power of seducing anyone, so he seduces men and women. One sex apparently isn’t
enough though, and we see that in both novel and TV show. His other flaw is
that in the show, he does not have an ounce of terror in his appearance. If he
came up to me and told me he was going to bite my neck, I would expect a hickey,
not two puncture wounds where he fed off of. He looks like the kind of person
that you would invite to have coffee with. Another flaw of his is that he can
sense when people are sexually frustrated. That being said, when someone isn’t
getting it in, he seduces them, forcing them to sexual bliss. Have I mentioned
the term “pig”? It’s kind of surprising for a character that doesn’t come
across as masculine. He doesn’t look very muscular and his long hair and nails
seem natural to him.
In tying these ridiculous gender roles to the
story of Dracula and entwining with Buffy the Vampire Slayer, we see how sexual
frustration/oppression is dealt with in the works. In the TV episode, it
bluntly shows how Dracula is beyond willing to sexually heal the person in
need. In the novel, the sexual oppression is there in the females, but it’s not
as blunt as the show. Either way, if you don’t take care of your girl, Dracula
will (as it seems). You wouldn’t be able
to see this if it wasn’t for the crazy gender roles society has given to its
characters.
I could not agree more with what you are saying! I also watched the Buffy vs. Dracula episode and it was my first time ever watching it as well. As you stated, they do play into a lot of gender stereotypes such as the girly girls and guys being jocks. I also found it interesting that you said that a lot of the time the females are dependent on the males but could also be seen as vice versa, great point! Also, as you have stated, there are a lot of similarities between the book and you did a great job of correlating the two. One of them being that in the book and show he is able to seduce both men and women. In the show, he obviously wants Buffy, and in the book he wants Mina. I thought this was a great analysis!
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you and I was in complete shock too by the fact Dracula the book was so long and the producers of each episode was able to take a lot of information and put it all into forty-five minute episodes. I like how you went into detail not only describing the similarities but the differences too because those are what stand out the most. I love the fact that you compared and contrasted Willow and Anya because initially I didn't even consider that but now looking back that is a great example of the different ways female characters were represented in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I like how you didn't just go into detail explaining only the female roles but the male roles as well! This is something not everyone does! I also like your conclusion paragraph which really summed up your key points nicely. Great job!
ReplyDelete